2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
THE SECRETARY, LG AND RD and others Versus Dr. AMJAD ALI KHAN
| Citation | 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Tanvir Ahmed Khan and Falak Sher, JJ |
| Parties | THE SECRETARY, LG AND RD and others Versus Dr. AMJAD ALI KHAN |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Tanvir Ahmed Khan and Falak Sher, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (THE SECRETARY, LG AND RD and others Versus Dr. AMJAD ALI KHAN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Dr. M. Mohyuddin Qazi, Advocate Supreme Court and C.M Latif Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 24th December, 2003.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, dated 27‑3‑2003 passed in Service Appeal No.2255 of 2002). Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999‑‑‑
R.4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑‑Reduction in rank‑‑‑Spreading of epidemic of cholera due to contamination of water resulting, into 14 deaths‑‑‑Civil servant, a Medical Officer in Municipal Committee also having additional charge of Officer of Health was charge‑sheeted and awarded punishment‑‑‑Service Tribunal accepted appeal of civil servant and set aside such punishment‑‑‑Validity‑‑ Water supply scheme was under the charge of Public Health Engineering Department which, was responsible for taking water samples‑‑‑Civil servant had nothing to do with water supply scheme‑‑‑Commissioner in his report had totally exonerated Health Department and found Public health Engineering Department responsible‑‑‑Supreme Court dismissed petition and refused leave to appeal.
Judgment & Decree
TANVIR AHMED KHAN, J‑‑‑Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment dated 27‑3‑2003 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore whereby appeal filed by the respondent was accepted setting aside his punishment of his reduction in rank with a censure to him to be careful for his duties.
2. Facts briefly are that the respondent who was a Medical Officer in M.C. Bahawalpur was having an additional charge of the Officer of Health in June, 2000 in Islamia Colony, Bahawalpur. In one block, an epidemic of cholera spread which resulted into 14 deaths. An inquiry was conducted wherein it was determined that the epidemic spread due to contamination of water in the houses. The respondent was charge‑sheeted whereafter he was awarded major penalty of reduction in the rank by five stages below his present place.
3. Being aggrieved, he filed a departmental appeal, which was rejected by the Chairman, Local Government Board. Then he filed an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore which has been accepted as stated in the preceding paragraph. Hence, the petitioners/departments have filed this petition against the impugned judgment dated 27‑3‑2003.
4. We have considered the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the documents appended with this petition. We have noticed that the respondent was not only Medical Officer but also having an additional charge of Officer of Health. It has come to light that the water supply scheme was under the charge of Public Health Engineering Department and the present respondent had nothing to do with that. The Commissioner in his report had totally exonerated the Health Department and held the Public Health Engineering Department responsible It would be appropriate to reproduce the determination of the Punjab Service Tribunal, which is in the following terms:‑‑ "
5. After hearing the arguments it is observed that appellant was pleading his case on a wrong ground. No doubt under Local. Government Ordinance water is exempted but under the Pure; Food Ordinance he was supposed to take water samples which he did not. At the same time had he collected samples the cause of epidemic would have not been determined unless the samples would have not been taken form the affected houses. Bahawalpur is a big city which is connected by many water supply schemes. The instant water supply scheme was under the charge of Public Health Engineering Department. Though not barred yet it was the responsibility of Public Health Engineering Department to take the samples. Report of the Commissioner, Bahawalpur after joint inquiry has fixed the responsibility upon 5 Officers/Officials of Public Health Engineering Department Municipal Corporation and Health Department have been exempted. Further, the punishment awarded to the appellant is not provided under the rules under which he has been proceeded, against. Appeal is accepted. The impugned order of punishment and rejection of appeal are set aside with a censure to the appellant to be careful for his duties."
5. So far as the ground of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the punishment awarded to the respondent was provided in the Statute and the Punjab Service Tribunal has wrongly held that the same was not available under the rules. We are not inclined to undertake this plea in the present case as in this case the respondent had totally been exonerated. The learned counsel for the petitioners has failed to point out any legal infirmity in the impugned judgment warranting interference.
6. Resultantly, for what has been stated above, the instant petition being devoid of any force is hereby dismissed and leave to appeal is declined. S.A.K./S‑27/S Leave refused.