1989 PLP 9 (MLD)
ISHTIAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAISTA BIBI — Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 9 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Zia Mahmood Mirza, J |
| Parties | ISHTIAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAISTA BIBI — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 9 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 9 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 9 (MLD) (ISHTIAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAISTA BIBI — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Abdul Sattar for Petitioner.
- Ch. Bashir Ahmad for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 5th October, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
O. XXI--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.l99--Execution of decree Parties entered into compromise before Court in full and final satisfaction of the decretal amount--Constitutional petition disposed of in terms of the compromise.
Judgment & Decree
O. XXI--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.l99--Execution of decree Parties entered into compromise before Court in full and final satisfaction of the decretal amount--Constitutional petition disposed of in terms of the compromise. Mian Abdul Sattar for Petitioner. Ch. Bashir Ahmad for Respondent. Date of hearing: 5th October, 1988. This petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan is directed against the order of the Chairman, Arbitration Council Ward No.26, Lahore dated 4-9-1985 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,000 per month as maintenance allowance to his wife Mst. Shaista Bibi respondent No.3 herein.
2. When the case came up for hearing today, parties with the help of their counsel entered into a negotiated settlement whereby the petitioner has agreed to pay and respondent No.3 has agreed to accept Rs.11,000 (Rupees eleven thousand) in lump sum in full and final satisfaction of the decretal amount. Statements of the parties in support of the compromise have been recorded. They, have stated that the writ petition be disposed of in terms of the compromise. Their statements shall form part of this order. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties incorporated in their statement. There will be no order as to costs. M.Z.S./1-99/L Order accordingly.