1995SCMR156 (PLP)
KHALID ALTAF HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. FAHMIDA MALIK and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1995SCMR156 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Fazal Ilahi Khan, JJ |
| Parties | KHALID ALTAF HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. FAHMIDA MALIK and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995SCMR156 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995SCMR156 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Fazal Ilahi Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995SCMR156 (PLP) (KHALID ALTAF HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. FAHMIDA MALIK and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 11th January, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of Lahore High Court, dated 14‑7‑1993 'passed in C.M. 100/93). Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑OXXI, R. 10‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑High Court's direction that execution application pending before it be fixed for hearing on specified date, which date had been fixed with the consent of parties' counsel with further direction that no further adjournment would be allowed in the case‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Petitioner could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the order of high Court‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
SAEEDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.‑‑‑The petitioner is seeking leave to appeal against. the order of a learned Judge in Chambers of Lahore High Court dated 14‑7‑1993 whereby the learned Judge while disposing of C.M. No.100‑B/93.directed that the execution application pending before him be fixed for hearing on 21‑7‑1993 which date has been fixed with the consent of all the counsel with further direction that no further adjournment will be allowed in the case.
2. We have heard Mr. Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, who is unable to point out any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. This petition has no merit which is, accordingly, dismissed and leave to appeal is refused. A.A./K‑248/S Leave refused.