1982 PLP 658 (CLC)
ALLAH BALI‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1982 PLP 658 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam, J |
| Parties | ALLAH BALI‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981}‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1982 PLP 658 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981}‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1982 PLP 658 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1982 PLP 658 (CLC) (ALLAH BALI‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Wafadar Khan for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.
- Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Respondent No. 5.
- Date of hearing : 5th December, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ Art. 9‑Allotment of land‑Petitioner's whole allotment of land not confirmed on ground of part of that land having been allotted to somebody else‑Petitioner allowed allotment of remaining land from any available land in circumstances of case.
Judgment & Decree
Wafadar Khan for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 to
4. Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Respondent No.
5. Date of hearing : 5th December, 1980. JUDGMENT. The petitioner was allotted land measuring 14 Kanals and 2 marlas on 11‑4‑1969. It should have been confirmed in due course after fifteen days. It was not done. On his representation the learned Member, Board of Revenue, has directed confirmation of land equivalent to 8 kanals and 18 marlas out of Khasra No. 34/14 proposed at Khata No. 59/92 of Reg1ster RL. II of village Bhindor, Tehsil and D1strict Sheikhupura. 5 kanals and 4 marlas were not ordered to be confirmed as the same have been allotted to somebody else. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was entitled to the confirmation of the entire land allotted to him and that should have been deemed to have been confirmed in his favour after the period of 15 days. In any case for these 5 kanals and 4 marlas not confirmed, he should be confirmed some other land.
2. The contention merits acceptance. The matter has remained pending. Therefore, it is directed that the petitioner shall be given a small area of 5 kanals and 4 marlas from any available land in the estate or near about in lieu of the land earlier allotted to him. The petition is thus allowed but without any order to costs in the circumstances. M. A. K. Petition accepted.