1968 PLP 1356 (SCMR)
Seth FAZAL HUSS AIN‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1968 PLP 1356 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Seth FAZAL HUSS AIN‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1962) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 PLP 1356 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1962) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 PLP 1356 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 PLP 1356 (SCMR) (Seth FAZAL HUSS AIN‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Bashir Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Salim Ahmad Malik, Attorney for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 20th June 1968.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi, dated the 5th September 1967, in First Appeal No. 67 of 1967). -- Art. 58(3)‑Petition for Special Leave to Appeal against decree of High Court‑Leave granted in view of High Court's decree being one of reversal and because complicated questions of law and facts required consideration. ORDER SAJJAD AHMAD, J.‑This petition is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi in First Appeal whereby a decree passed in favour of the petitioner by the first Court against respondent No. 1 (The Government of West Pakistan) in the sum of Rs. 1,06,771‑11‑1 with future interest at 4% per annum or. the decretal amount till its recovery was set aside. As complicated issues of fact and law arise in the ease which involve a substantial amount of over Rs. 1 lakh and the decree of the High Court under challenge is one of reversal, we grant leave to appeal. The petitioner shall deposit security in the sum of Rs. 2,000 for costs before the appeal is set down for hearing. Leave granted.
Judgment & Decree
SAJJAD AHMAD, J.‑This petition is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi in First Appeal whereby a decree passed in favour of the petitioner by the first Court against respondent No. 1 (The Government of West Pakistan) in the sum of Rs. 1,06,771‑11‑1 with future interest at 4% per annum or. the decretal amount till its recovery was set aside. As complicated issues of fact and law arise in the ease which involve a substantial amount of over Rs. 1 lakh and the decree of the High Court under challenge is one of reversal, we grant leave to appeal. The petitioner shall deposit security in the sum of Rs. 2,000 for costs before the appeal is set down for hearing. Leave granted.