P L D 2024 Supreme Court 497 (PLP)
General (Retd.) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | P L D 2024 Supreme Court 497 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Amin-ud-Din Khan and Athar Minallah, JJ |
| Parties | General (Retd.) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Act (XVII of 1976) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 2024 Supreme Court 497 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Act (XVII of 1976) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 2024 Supreme Court 497 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Amin-ud-Din Khan and Athar Minallah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 2024 Supreme Court 497 (PLP) (General (Retd.) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Barrister Salman Safdar, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant.
- Ch. Aamir Rehman, Additional Attorney-General for Pakistan for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 12(3)
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 431
Appeal to the Supreme Court against final judgment of the Special Court
Legal heirs of convict neither responding to notices nor appearing before the Supreme Court
Effect
Supreme Court, though not obliged to do so, but in the interest of justice, had also issued notices to the legal heirs of the appellant (convict) on all available addresses and which were provided, both within the country and abroad
Notices were also published in a leading English newspaper and a leading Urdu newspaper
However, none of the legal heirs had come forward and elected to contest present appeal
Counsel for the deceased appellant stated that the legal heirs did not approach him, let alone engage him, and had also not responded to the notices/publications issued by the Supreme Court; that in his opinion the instant appeal abates in terms of section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
In the given circumstances, and as none of the legal heirs had come forward, the present appeal was dismissed as having abated
Consequently, the conviction of the appellant by the Special Court subsisted.
Judgment & Decree
QAZI FAEZ ISA, C.J. This appeal arrayed General (retired) Pervez Musharraf as the appellant and the Federation of Pakistan, the Special Court and the State as the respondents. The appellant was convicted by the Special Court vide judgment dated 17 December 2019 and the instant appeal was filed on 16 January 2020 under section 12(3) of the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1976. Since as per legal requirement, the appellant had not surrendered himself the office of this Court had raised objection to the maintainability of this appeal. However, learned counsel Mr. Salman Safdar contended that the appellant was indisposed and under treatment abroad, therefore, he was not in a position to appear before this Court. Subsequently, the appellant passed away on 5 February 2023, as informed by learned Mr. Safdar, who had sought time to contact the appellant's legal heirs. Time was also granted by this Court on 10 November, 2023. Learned Mr. Safdar states that he had sent messages to the legal heirs of the deceased appellant but did not receive any response from them.
2. This Court, though not obliged to do so, but in the interest of justice, had also issued notices to the legal heirs of the appellant on all available addresses and which were provided, both within the country and abroad. Notices were also published in the leading English newspaper 'DAWN' and the leading Urdu newspaper 'JANG'. However, none of the legal heirs have come forward and elected to contest this appeal.
3. On 28 November 2023 the following two questions were also framed: '(1) Whether on the death of the appellant the appeal did not abate in terms of section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898; and (2) If the conviction of the appellant is upheld, the consequences thereof, including on the rights/benefits of the appellant and his legal heirs.'
4. Learned Mr. Safdar states that the legal heirs did not approach him, let alone engage him, and have also not responded to the notices/ publications issued by this Court. He submits that in his opinion the instant appeal abates in terms of section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.
5. Therefore, in the given circumstances, and as none of the legal heirs have come forward, the instant appeal is dismissed as having abated. Consequently, the conviction of the appellant by the Special Court subsists. MWA/P-1/SC Appeal dismissed.