1983SCM R7 (PLP)
REHMAT KHAN-Petitioner Versus Mst. SARDAR BIBI AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1983SCM R7 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | ----Division of property-Property in dispute divided in course of litiga tion into 9 units and each unit transferred to its respective occupant Petitioner, held, possessed no locus stands to question transfer of units not in his occupation.-Locus stands. |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | REHMAT KHAN-Petitioner Versus Mst. SARDAR BIBI AND OTHERS-Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Settlement Scheme No. VIII, (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983SCM R7 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Settlement Scheme No. VIII, (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983SCM R7 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the ----Division of property-Property in dispute divided in course of litiga tion into 9 units and each unit transferred to its respective occupant Petitioner, held, possessed no locus stands to question transfer of units not in his occupation.-Locus stands. bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983SCM R7 (PLP) (REHMAT KHAN-Petitioner Versus Mst. SARDAR BIBI AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Salah-ud-Din, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing : 20th March, 1982:
- Mian Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Salah‑ud‑Din, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Division of property-Property in dispute divided in course of litiga tion into 9 units and each unit transferred to its respective occupant Petitioner, held, possessed no locus stands to question transfer of units not in his occupation.-[Locus stands].
Art. 188 and Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. XXVI-Review-Points raised in review application already advanced at hearing of original petition and attended to by court-Review, held, not competent. [Review by Supreme Court].
Judgment & Decree
M. S. H. QURESHI, J.‑This is a petition seeking review of this Court's order dated .24‑2‑1981, whereby the petitioner's Civil Petition for grant of leave (No. 925 of .1975) had been dismissed. It is urged that the various portion of the property could not be transferred to the respondents as all of them had not filed form initially and that their forms filed under Settle ment Scheme No. VIII could not be entertained during the pendency of the litigation, nor could the said portions of the property be said to have become "available" for the purposes of that' Scheme while the dispute was on.
2. We are not satisfied that the petitioner has any case for review. The property had in the course of the litigation been divided into nine units and each unit had been transferred to its respective occupant. The petition had, therefore, no locus stands to question the transfer of units which had not been in his occupation. The points now raised had been advanced all the hearing of the Civil Petition and attended to by the Bench. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. Petition dismissed.