1987 PLP 1645 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD YUSUF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1645 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | Abdul Karim Khan Kundi, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YUSUF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1645 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1645 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Abdul Karim Khan Kundi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1645 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD YUSUF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Munsif Khan for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 31st August, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.436--Bail, grant of--Cattleshed put on fire--Minor loss as result of fire- -Co-accused allegedly armed already released on bail--One of co-accused not yet arrested--Two unidentified persons mentioned in F.I.R., not traced--Accused empty-handed--Bail granted in circumstances. Mian Shakirullah Jan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.436--Bail, grant of--Cattleshed put on fire--Minor loss as result of fire- -Co-accused allegedly armed already released on bail--One of co-accused not yet arrested--Two unidentified persons mentioned in F.I.R., not traced--Accused empty-handed--Bail granted in circumstances. Malik Munsif Khan for Petitioner. Mian Shakirullah Jan for the State. Date of hearing: 31st August, 1986. Vide F.I. R. No. 129 dated 10-6-1986 lodged at 6-15' hours about an occurrence of 5-30 hours Muhammad Yusuf accused petitioner alongwith his son Amjad, one Abdul Malik and two unidentified persons were reported present standing near the cattleshed on fire and where the complainant raised alarm, All Akbar, Muhammad Afsar and the womenfolk came out of their houses and extinguished. The complainant charged the accused for having put cattleshed on fire by sprinkling oil (kerosine). One Sharafat reported to be present who has witnessed the accused, Ali Akbar the eye-witness cited in the F.I.R. did not state to have seen the accused party present and he further stated that even Sharafat was not present at the time and place of occurrence. 2. The fire has since been extinguished. There has, been minor loss as a result of the fire. Co-accused Abdul Malik report armed has since been released on bail and there is many a fact regarding cancellation of his bail, Amjad co-accused has not been arrested so far, Yusuf accused-petitioner was reported empty handed. He was released on bail by the Magistrate but the learned Session Judge recalled his bail for he was previously charged for the offence under section 506/34, P.P.C. The other two unidentified person have not been traced as yet. In the circumstances, I would release the accused-petitioner on bail in the bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Ilaqa/Duty Magistrate. S. A./522/P. Bail granted.