MLD 1986

1986 PLP 1695 (MLD)

MUHAMMAD AYUB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2110‑B of 1986, decided on 6th August 1986.
Honorable Judges
Khizar Hayat, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 1695 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Khizar Hayat, J
Parties MUHAMMAD AYUB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1695 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1695 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khizar Hayat, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1695 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD AYUB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Syed Jamshed Ali for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S.497‑ Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.307, 380, 411 & 458‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused, admittedly not among culprits who broke open into house‑‑Accused found in possession of stolen property‑‑Recovery already effected‑‑Accused remaining in jail for about two months‑‑Accused, held, entitled to be released on bail in circumstances. Ejaz Ahmad Chaudhry for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑S.497‑ Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.307, 380, 411 & 458‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused, admittedly not among culprits who broke open into house‑‑Accused found in possession of stolen property‑‑Recovery already effected‑‑Accused remaining in jail for about two months‑‑Accused, held, entitled to be released on bail in circumstances. Syed Jamshed Ali for Petitioner. Ejaz Ahmad Chaudhry for the State. This petition has been moved on behalf of Muhammad Ayub petitioner who stands arrested in a case registered at Police Station Sadar, Sheikhupura, under sections 458, 380, 307 and 411, P.P.C. The petitioner's bail plea was declined by the lower Courts, hence this petition. According to the prosecution one Muhammad Ashraf lodged an F.I.R. at Police Station Sadar, Sheikhupura, to the effect that on the preceding night, four persons, namely, Muhammad Ramzan alias Jahana, Wazir Ali, Faqir Hussain and Ashiq had broken into his house and stole a way number of articles, etc. He also alleged that he and his Mohalladars tried to apprehend the culprits but they made good their escape except Ashiq who was caught at the spot. The incident was accordingly reported at 9‑05 a.m. the following morning.

2. During the investigations Muhammad Ramzan, Wazir Ali and Faqir Hussain were arrested and stolen property belonging to the complainant was recovered at their instance. A raid was conducted on the berg of Ayub petitioner wherefrom the stolen Sony T.V. belonging to the complainant was also recovered on 13‑6‑1986. The petitioner was thus arrested and has since been challaned.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State and perused the record.

4. Admittedly, the petitioner was not among the culprits who had broken into the house of Muhammad Ashraf complainant for committing burglary. The only allegation against him is that he kept in possession stolen property/Sony T. V. /knowing or having reason to believe as such. Since the recovery has been effected and the petitioner is in jail for about two months, therefore, I feel inclined to allow this petition. He is directed' to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Sheikhupura. S.A Bail allowed.