1987 PLP 2915 (MLD)
PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 2915 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Afrasiab Khan, J |
| Parties | PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 2915 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 2915 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Afrasiab Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 2915 (MLD) (PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mehar Ghulam Ali Mubashir for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10--Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.14--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.506/342- Bail--Witnesses swore affidavits against prosecution and in favour of accuse d--Prosecutrix had not been medically examined so far and State counsel could not successfully controvert this position--Case was, held, of further enquiry--Bail granted. Nisar Khalil for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S.497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10--Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.14--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.506/342- Bail--Witnesses swore affidavits against prosecution and in favour of accuse d--Prosecutrix had not been medically examined so far and State counsel could not successfully controvert this position--Case was, held, of further enquiry--Bail granted. Mehar Ghulam Ali Mubashir for Petitioner. Nisar Khalil for the State. The petitioner Parvaiz Akhtar has moved this petition for bail after arrest under section 497/498, Cr.P.C. in a case registered against him under section 10 of the Offence of Zina. (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979,. under section 14 of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VI of 1979 and under section 506/342, P.P.C. at Police Station Saddar, Gujrat, vide F.I.R. No.643, dated 14-10-1986. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the witnesses, namely. Muhammad Siddid Bashir Ahmad, Ch. Rehmat Khan, Haji Barkat Ali, Ch. Jamil Hussain and Ch. Ghulam Sarwar have sworn affidavits against the prosecution and in favour of the petitioner. The learned counsel has placed heavy reliance on these affidavits and has submitted that in view of these affidavits, there is no case A against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the prosecutrix has not at all been medically examined so far. The learned State counsel has not been able to dislodge the petitioner on that score. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that this is a case of further inquiry. Accordingly I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of A.C. Gujrat. M. A. K./P-27/L Bail granted.