SCMR 2011

2011 SCMR 298 (PLP)

Messrs KOHINOOR LOOMS LIMITED — Petitioner Versus MCB BANK LIMITED — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 145-L and C.M.A. No. 62-L of 2010, decided on 3rd March, 2010.
Honorable Judges
Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 SCMR 298 (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, JJ
Parties Messrs KOHINOOR LOOMS LIMITED — Petitioner Versus MCB BANK LIMITED — Respondent
Primary Law Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 SCMR 298 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 SCMR 298 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 SCMR 298 (PLP) (Messrs KOHINOOR LOOMS LIMITED — Petitioner Versus MCB BANK LIMITED — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)

Representation

  • Sajid Mehmood Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal against the order dated 4-1-2010 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore in EFA No.3 of 2010).

S. 22(6)

Constitution of Pakistan, Art.185(3)

Counsel for the petitioner had contended that High Court was not justified in holding that order passed by Banking Judge was not appealable and that reserved price of the property as fixed by the High Court was presumptuous and not in accord with its market value

Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider said issues and any other issue which could arise. Pakistan Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation Limited and others v. Government of Pakistan 2002 CLD 1 ref.

Judgment & Decree

TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, J.

Refers to section 22(6) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and relies on a judgment of this Court reported at Pakistan Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation Limited and others v. Government of Pakistan (2002 CLD 1) to contend that the learned High Court fell in error in holding that the order passed by the learned Banking Judge was not appealable. Adds that the reserve price fixed by the learned High' Court is presumptuous and not in accord with its market value.

2. Having considered the submissions made, leave is granted to consider the afore-referred issue raised and any other issue which may arise. CMA 62-L of 2010

3. Notice for 22-3-2010. H.B.T./K-9/SC Leave granted.