PLD 1959

P L D 1959 W (PLP)

GAMA and others‑Petitioners Versus MOHAMMAD HUSAIN and others‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Revision Side No. 13 of 1956‑57, decided on 7th March 1957, District Gujrat.
Honorable Judges
H. A. Majid, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1959 W (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members H. A. Majid, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Parties GAMA and others‑Petitioners Versus MOHAMMAD HUSAIN and others‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1959 W (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1959 W (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: H. A. Majid, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1959 W (PLP) (GAMA and others‑Petitioners Versus MOHAMMAD HUSAIN and others‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Muhammad Sadiq for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), S. 84‑Revision‑Board's powers not to be invoked unless party has tried to obtain redress from CommissionerCase sent on to Commissioner.

Judgment & Decree

Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), S. 84‑Revision‑Board's powers not to be invoked unless party has tried to obtain redress from CommissionerCase sent on to Commissioner. Muhammad Sadiq for Petitioners. The powers of revision as contained in section 84 of the' Punjab Tenancy Act, taking into account the adaptations and amendments which have lately taken place, can be exercised by the Commissioner of a Division as well as by the Board of Revenue. In the present case, the orders so far obtained are from the Assistant Collector and the Collector. I consider it expedient as a matter of policy that the Board of Revenue's revisional jurisdiction should not be invoked until the parties concerned have done the needful in order to obtain their redress from the Commissioner. I, therefore, direct that this case may be transferred to the Commissioner, Rawalpindi Division, for disposal according to the law. The address of the petitioners' is already on the file. The Commissioner will be able to send them the necessary notice at his earliest convenience. A. H. Case transferred to Commissioner.