1979 PLP 40(1) (CLC)
ZAREEN KHAN-Appellant Versus Agha JAN MUHAMMAD-Respondent
| Citation | 1979 PLP 40(1) (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ZAREEN KHAN-Appellant Versus Agha JAN MUHAMMAD-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1979 PLP 40(1) (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1979 PLP 40(1) (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1979 PLP 40(1) (CLC) (ZAREEN KHAN-Appellant Versus Agha JAN MUHAMMAD-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nemo for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
Ibrahim v. Muhammad Hussain P L D 1975 S C 457 and Mian Manzur Bashir and others v. M. A. Asghar d; Co. P L D 1978 S C 185 rel. Riaz Kayani for Appellant: Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing : 5th March 1979. During the course of hearing of an application for ejectment of the appellant from the plot in dispute, the Rent Controller passed on 27th November, 1974, an order under section 13(6) of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, directing the appellant to deposit arrears as well as the future rent. The appellant filed an appeal against this order before the District Judge who admitted the same on 11th December, 1974, but refused to suspend the operation of the order impugned before him. This interim order has been challenged by the present appeal.
2. The appeal is liable to be dismissed in view of Ibrahim v.1 Muhammad Hussain (PLD1975SC457) and Mian Manzar Bashir and others v. M. A. Asghar & Co. (PLD 1978 S C185) in which it has been held that interlocutory orders passed under the above Ordinance are not appealable. The appeal is, therefore dismissed without any order as to costs.
3. The case shall go back to the learned District Judge for disposing of the appeal in the light of the same authorities. The record may be sent back to the appellate Court for proper orders. without any delay. Appeal dismissed.