1999 PLP 2408 (SCMR)
Prof. MUMTAZ ALI — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1999 PLP 2408 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Ajmal Mian, C. J., Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ |
| Parties | Prof. MUMTAZ ALI — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 2408 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 2408 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Ajmal Mian, C. J., Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 2408 (SCMR) (Prof. MUMTAZ ALI — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant.
- Maulvi Anwar-ul-Haq, Deputy Attorney-General with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th October, 1998.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 30-8-1998 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No. 250-R of 1995).
Civil servant claimed grant of Grade-20 contending that co-civil servant who was given Grade-20 as against him was no longer in field as he had retired from service and that post which civil servant was holding had been upgraded to Grade-20
Appeal to Supreme Court was disposed of with observation that Competent Authority would consider case of civil servant for grant of Grade-20 to him in view of up-gradation of the post.
Judgment & Decree
AJMAL MIAN, C.J.
Learned counsel for the appellant points out that the original respondent-Sajad Akbar, who was given Grade-20 instead of the appellant, had retired from service and, therefore, he is no longer in the field. He further points out that even the post which the appellant is holding has been upgraded to Grade-20 through Notification, dated 20th April, 1993 (Notification is at page 26 of the paper book).
2. In view of the above development the above appeal is disposed of with the observation that the competent Authority shall consider the appellant's case for grant of above Grade-20 in view of the upgradation of the post and decide the same within a period of 3 months. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./M-240/S Order accordingly.