2010 PLP 1399 (YLR)
FAKHARUDDIN QUNDRANI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 1399 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Faisal Arab, J |
| Parties | FAKHARUDDIN QUNDRANI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1399 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1399 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Faisal Arab, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1399 (YLR) (FAKHARUDDIN QUNDRANI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392/34
State Counsel had opposed the grant of bail to accused on the ground that recovery had been made from accused within four hours; and that accused was also carrying an unlicensed weapon and that complainant had identified accused in the identification parade as one of the culprits
No case for bail, having been made out, bail application was dismissed, in circumstances. Abdul Salam Memon for Applicant. Mumtaz Mehdi APG for the State.
Judgment & Decree
FAISAL ARAB, J.
Applicant Fakhruddin Qundrani is booked in F.I.R. No.748/2008 under section 392/34, P.P.C. Shahra-e-Faisal, Karachi. According to the F.I.R. some unknown persons snatched the car of the complainant at gun point at 3-00 a.m. night. However, in the early morning they were arrested by the police at Neepa along with an unlicensed weapon. During the identification parade the complainant identified the present accused being one of the accused persons who had snatched his car. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that it is unbelievable that the applicant who snatched the car at 3-00 a.m. at night but did not leave Karachi and he was arrested in the morning. He further stated that when the police stopped the applicant he did not run away meaning thereby that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further stated that the applicant has been involved in a number of cases and he is treated as "usual suspect" by the police. He contended that one day before this incident the uncle of the applicant had lodged a complaint with the police that an attempt was made to kidnap him (uncle) and the present applicant (nephew) by 25 persons but he succeeded in avoiding such attempt but those persons kidnapped the present applicant. Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the grant of bail on the ground that recovery has been made from the applicant within four hours and that he was also carrying an unlicensed weapon. He further contended that the complainant has identified the present accused in the identification parade as one of the culprits. In these circumstances, no case for bail is made out. Resultantly, bail application is dismissed. H.B.T./F-3/K Bail refused.