1986 P (PLP)
INAYATULLA H‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J |
| Parties | INAYATULLA H‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P (PLP) (INAYATULLA H‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Irshad Hussain Bhatti for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 19th November, 1985.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 11‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No allegation of Zina against accused‑ Challan completed and accused no more required by Police‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Farooq Bedar Asstt. A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Farooq Bedar Asstt. A.‑G. for the State. Date of hearing: 19th November, 1985. Inayat Ullah son of Khadam Hussain Moghal, resident of Mohalla New Area, Tehsil Kharian, District Gujrat, has applied for bail after arrest.
2. A case under section 11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 was registered against him at Police 'Station, Kharian.
3. The report was lodged by Fazal Ahmad, father of abductee, on 19‑3‑1985 at 5.00 p.m.
4. Bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gujrat by order, dated 17‑9‑1985.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had been behind the bars for 7 months and the trial has not yet commenced. There was no allegation of rape against him. There was a delay of four days in lodging the report. Police Station was hardly at a distance of Three furlongs from the place where the alleged incident took place.
6. I have also heard learned A . A . ‑G.
7. It is an admitted position that the allegation against the petitioner is not of rape. Challan has been completed. The person of the petitioner is no more required by the police. I, ther6fore, admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C.Gujrat. S.G.D. Bail granted.