1987 PLP 1144 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ZAHEER KHAN and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ZAMIR KHAN‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1144 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ZAHEER KHAN and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ZAMIR KHAN‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1144 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1144 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1144 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ZAHEER KHAN and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ZAMIR KHAN‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Zakiuddin Pal, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Ch. Khurshid Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 26th April, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, dated 22‑12‑1982 in Civil Revision No. 1675 of 1982). Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ‑‑‑S. 115‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Revisional jurisdiction‑‑ Concurrent findings of Courts below‑‑Interference with‑ Concurrent findings of fact by two Courts below‑‑Not interfered with by High Court in revisional jurisdiction‑‑No infirmity having been pointed out in said findings, leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ‑‑‑S. 115‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Revisional jurisdiction‑‑ Concurrent findings of Courts below‑‑Interference with‑ Concurrent findings of fact by two Courts below‑‑Not interfered with by High Court in revisional jurisdiction‑‑No infirmity having been pointed out in said findings, leave to appeal refused. Zakiuddin Pal, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Ch. Khurshid Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent. Date of hearing: 26th April, 1987. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑The only question for consideration in this petition for special leave to appeal is whether respondent No. 1 was the son of Muhammad Nazir Khan who died in 1943. The trial Court and the Additional District Judge examined the evidence led by the parties and decided the question in the affirmative. The High Court in revisional jurisdiction declined to interfere with this concurrent finding. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to show us that this finding suffers from any infirmity. This petition is accordingly dismissed. M.I./M-91/S Petition dismissed.