PLD 1980

P L D 1980 Karachi 244 (PLP)

ALI AKBAR-Applicant Versus HABIBULLAH AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 87 of 1976. decided on 30th January, 1979.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1980 Karachi 244 (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J
Parties ALI AKBAR-Applicant Versus HABIBULLAH AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Primary Law (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1980 Karachi 244 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1980 Karachi 244 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1980 Karachi 244 (PLP) (ALI AKBAR-Applicant Versus HABIBULLAH AND ANOTHER-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Date of hearing : 30th January 1979.

Headnotes / Summary

._-- S. 561-A read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 424-Quashment of proceedings-Accused admittedly a hart of complainant and only allegation being his refusal to give him share of produce-Held: Not a case of dishonest removal of property within meaning of S. 424, P. P. C.-Matter, held further, related to inter se accounting between Zamindar and hart in regard to produce and as such maintainable before Revenue authorities for recovery of Zamindari share-Proceedings quashed, in circumstances. (6. 561-A-Quashment of proceedings-Delay-Some 6J years elapsing and no disposal of complaint-Besides complainant no other witness cited either in original complaint or in statement under S. 200, Cr. P. C.-Such inordinate delay by itself, held, a good ground for quashment of proceedings-Proceedings quashed, in circumstances.(Delay]. Abdul Fatah Memon for Applicant. Ghulam Ali Agha for the State.