SCMR 1985

1985 PLP 638 (SCMR)

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER exercising

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1985 PLP 638 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD RAFIQ — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER exercising
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 638 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 638 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 638 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD RAFIQ — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER exercising). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate and S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑ Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 2‑6‑1981, of the Lahore High Court; whereby a Constitutional Petition arising out of orders of maintenance passed in favour of respondent No. 3, was dismissed. We have heard the learned counsel on the main points raised before the High Court, namely, whether adequate opportunity of defending the case was afforded to the petitioner, and whether the amount of maintenance, i.e. Rs.500 per mensem could be fixed in this case. Both the points were adequately dealt with by the learned Judge in the High Court. In the circumstances of this case, there was no justification for the High Court for interference. We do not consider it a fit case for grant of permission to the learned counsel to raise new points. This petition accordingly is dismissed. M.I. Leave refused.