1987 PLP 3300 (MLD)
GHULAM HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 3300 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J |
| Parties | GHULAM HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 3300 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 3300 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 3300 (MLD) (GHULAM HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Abul Asim Jaffari for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 16th August, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497(1), proviso--Bail--Accused named in first information report- Prosecution case supported by prosecution witnesses who saw abductee going in company of accused and co-accused--Co-accused absconding and abductee not recovered--Bail refused in circumstances. -S.497--Bail--Accused aged about fifty-two years, held, could not be considered as aged or infirm person. --[Age]. Azmat Dad for the State. Saif-ul-Haq Ziay for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
S.497--Bail--Accused aged about fifty-two years, held, could not be considered as aged or infirm person. --[Age]. Syed Abul Asim Jaffari for Petitioner. Azmat Dad for the State. Saif-ul-Haq Ziay for the Complainant. Date of hearing: 16th August, 1987. In brief the facts of this case are that Muhammad Sadiq complainant and his family members were sleeping in the courtyard of their house. Muhammad Sadiq on 12-9-1986 got up in the morning and found his daughter Mst. Farhat aged about 17/18 years missing. He started searching her. He was informed by Sultan and Rustam PWs that they had seen Mst. Farhat at about 6 A.M. on the canal bank alongwith Allah Bakhsh, Wahid Ali, Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Bashiran. His search was fruitless. He, therefore on that very day at about 5.30 P.M. got the present case registered. 2. Allah Bakhsh accused is absconding. Mst. Farhat abductee has so far not been recovered. Wahid Ali and Ghulam Hussain accused are in lock up. Mst. Bashiran accused was allowed bail being woman. Muhammad Sadiq and Ghulam Khawaja accused were admitted to bail by lower Court because they were not named in the F.I.R. Mst. Bashiran, Whaid Ali accused and Allah Bakhsh absconder are sons of Ghulam Hussain accused. This petition has been filed only on behalf of Ghulam Hussain. In support of this petition it is contended by learned counsel that Ghulam Hussain is an aged person and that he had no connection with the present occurrence. It is, therefore, argued that he be allowed bail. No other point was urged in support of this petition. Ghulam Hussain is stated to be aged about 52 years. He cannot; therefore, be considered as an aged or infirm person. He has been named in F.I.R. The prosecution case is supported by Sultan and Rustam P.Ws. who had seen Mst. Farhat in the company of the accused on the canal bank. Allah Bakhsh accused is still absconding. Mst. Farhat abductee has so far not been recovered. In view of these circumstances I am not inclined to allow bail to Ghulam Hussain. This petition is accordingly dismissed. M.Y.H./G-103/L Bail disallowed.