2000 P Cr (PLP)
IMRAN ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE. STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2000 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Dr. Munir Ahmad Mughal, J |
| Parties | IMRAN ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE. STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Dr. Munir Ahmad Mughal, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 P Cr (PLP) (IMRAN ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE. STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Shabbir Langrial for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/324/34‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑ Accused according to the uncontroverted School Leaving Certificate was below 16 years of age on the date of occurrence and his case was covered by first proviso to 5.497, Cr.P.C.‑‑‑Factum of "Ghairat" had also come on the record during investigation which had made the case one of further inquiry‑‑ Bail was allowed to accused in circumstances. Zawar Hussain Qureshi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Malik Muhammad Shabbir Langrial for Petitioner. Zawar Hussain Qureshi for the State. ORDER. The petitioner is involved in the case F.I.R. No.804 of 1998 under section 302/324/34, P.P.C. Police Station Saddar Arifwala, District Pakpattan Sharif.
2. Briefly stated the case of the prosecution is that on 9‑10‑1998 at 11‑30 a.m. complainant Abdul Ghani had gone to take his son Ghulam Murtaza after school hours. In his presence the petitioner and his brother Kamran, both armed with daggers, launched assault upon Ghulam Murtaza and presort petitioner caused a dagger blow to the deceased on the left side of his chest who fell down. While Ghulam Mustafa brother of the deceased was inflicted two dagger blows by Kamran; brother of the petitioner. Ghulam Murtaza succumbed to the injuries. Earlier the bail was refused by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pakpattan Sharif on 3‑5‑1999. The bail is now pressed on the ground that the petitioner is under age of 16 years and his case ‑is covered by proviso I of section 497, Cr.P.C. and that only one blow has been attributed to him and that it has come in the investigation that the deceased and his brother were sodomists and used to tease the petitioner being of fair colour and complexion and, therefore, there was question of "Ghairat"'.
3. The bail is opposed on the grounds that the petitioner is specifically named and specific role has been attributed to him.
4. I have given due consideration to the valuable arguments on both sides.
5. Admittedly, the date of birth of the petitioner is 25‑4‑1983 and on the relevant date age comes to 14 years 5 months and 15 days and the case of the petitioner is covered by proviso‑I of section 497, Cr.P.C. It has been stated that the petitioner was born on 5‑8‑1981 and not on 25‑4‑1983 but the school leaving certificate issued by the Headmaster Government High School 50/B.B. Pakpattan Sharif is on the record which fact could not be controverted and the case of the petitioner clearly comes under the first proviso of section 497, Cr.P.C. The factum of "Ghairat" has also come on the record during investigation which makes the case that of farther inquiry. As such the petitioner is granted ‑bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. N.H.Q./I‑7/L Bail allowed