1984 PLP (2) (SCMR)
LAL KHAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP (2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | LAL KHAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP (2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP (2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP (2) (SCMR) (LAL KHAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. M. Y. Saraf, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 23rd November, 1983.
- Kh. M. Y. Saraf, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the order of the Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench), dated 5-6-1983, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 260-B of 1983). --Art. 185(3)--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 497 & 498-Bail - Penal Coda (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307/149 & 147/148--Accused-petitioner attributed hatchet blows from its reverse side on heads of deceased found to be grievous and one of them declared dangerous to life-Rejection of bail to accused, by High Court-Held, justified-Leave to appeal refused. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑Lal Khan petitioner has sought leave to appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi, dated 5‑6‑1983, dismissing his bail application. He is accused alongwith 6 others of offences under sections 307/149 and 147/148, P. P. C. He has been attributed hatchet blows from its reverse side to Aslam complainant as well as Khadim Hussain, P. W. on their heads. Both the injuries were found to be grievous and one of these was declared) to be dangerous to life. The High Court was, therefore, justified in rejecting, his bail application. We do not, therefore, consider it a fit case for grant of leave. The petition is consequently dismissed. S. Q. Petition dismissed.