YLR 2002

2002 PLP 942 (YLR)

LIAQAT ALI alias BAGA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.669‑B of 2002, decided on 11th April, 2002.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2002 PLP 942 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J
Parties LIAQAT ALI alias BAGA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 942 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 942 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 942 (YLR) (LIAQAT ALI alias BAGA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss 302/452/109/34‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Night time occurrence‑‑‑Complainant living at a different place had visited the house of the deceased as per chance on the night of occurrence‑‑‑No incriminating recovery had been elected from the accused‑‑‑Accused had been declared innocent by the police during successive investigations‑‑‑Discharge report had been prepared as regards the accused but the Magistrate did not agree with the same‑‑ Opinion of the police, though not binding on the Court but the same was a relevant factor for the purpose of determination of bail‑‑‑Case of the accused calling for further inquiry, he was granted bail. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Opinion of Investigating Officer‑‑Value ‑‑‑NatureOpinion of the police may not be binding upon the Courts but at the same time it is very relevant for purposes of determination of bail matters. Manzoor Hussain v. The State PLD 1972 SC 81 ref. Javed Iqbal for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Opinion of Investigating Officer‑‑Value ‑‑‑NatureOpinion of the police may not be binding upon the Courts but at the same time it is very relevant for purposes of determination of bail matters. Manzoor Hussain v. The State PLD 1972 SC 81 ref. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner. Javed Iqbal for the State. Liaqat Ali alias Bagga petitioner has sought his postarrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 198 registered at Police Station Gaggo, District Vehari on 5‑6‑2000 for offences under sections 302/452/109/34, P.P.C.

2. Briefly, the fact as given in the F.I.R. are that the complainant was invited by Muhammad Yaqoob deceased, his brother to spend the night with him as certain matters were to be discussed. At about 1‑00 a.m. the petitioner armed with pistol, Amjad armed with a stick and Ashfaq armed with a rifle trespassed the house of the deceased and by raising lalkara woke up Muhammad Sajjad nephew of the complainant. It is further stated that the accused were identified in the light of a electric bulb and during occurrence Muhammad Amjad accused gave a sota blow on the head of the deceased who fell down. Thereafter, Muhammad Yaqoob‑deceased was dragged by the accused out of the house into the street and the petitioner who was armed with a pistol allegedly twice fired at Muhammad Yaqoob who succumbed to the injuries.

3. After his arrest the petitioner is in the judicial lock‑up.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and have also perused the record of the case. Admittedly, it is a night occurrence and the complainant lived at a different place and came to the house of the deceased on the night of the occurrence per chance. After the arrest of the petitioner nothing was recovered from him and during successive investigation the petitioner was found innocent and a discharge report was prepared vis-a‑vis the petitioner which was submitted before the Area Magistrate on 29‑9‑2000. However, the Magistrate did not agree with the same. The opinion of the police may not be binding upon the Courts but at the same hand it is very relevant for the purposes of determination of bail. Reliance is placed on the case of Manzoor Hussain v. The State (PLD 1972 S.C. 81).

5. For what has been discussed above I am of the opinion that the allegation against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the ambit of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. Therefore, I admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. S.M.A.H./L‑41/L Bail granted.