1999 PLP 146 (SCMR)
NOOR KHAN — Petitioner Versus THESTATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1999 PLP 146 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, Sh. Ijaz Nisar and Mamoon Kazi, JJ |
| Parties | NOOR KHAN — Petitioner Versus THESTATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 146 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 146 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, Sh. Ijaz Nisar and Mamoon Kazi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 146 (SCMR) (NOOR KHAN — Petitioner Versus THESTATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Asghar Khan Rokhri, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmoodul Islam, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 23rd June 1998
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order, dated 18-11-1997, of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Crl.A. 296/1996). S. 302(b)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)
Leave to appeal was granted to consider contentions that the accused had no direct motive against the deceased, that ocular testimony was in serious conflict with medical evidence with regard to the distance from which the shots were fired at the deceased and that the testimony of eye-witnesses having been disbelieved qua majority of the accused persons, same could not have been acted upon against the present accused alone in the absence of any . independent or material corroboration.
Judgment & Decree
SH. IJAZ NISAR, J.
This petition is directed against the judgment, dated 18-11-1997, passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore, in Criminal Appeal No.296 of 1996.
2. The fact, in brief, are that Noor Khan petitioner alngwith 4 others was tried for the murder of Khalas Khan deceased with a fire-arm. By judgment, dated 27-3-1996, the Judge Special Court Suppression of Terrorist Activities, Faisalabad and Sargodha Division, convicted the petitioner under section 302/149, P. P.C. and sentenced him to death, while his co-accused were also convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life. They were also convicted under section 148, P.P.C. and sentenced to 3 years' R.I. each. By judgment dated 18-11-1997 the learned High Court dismissed the appeal of Noor Khan petitioner, but altered his conviction from section 302(a), P.Pt. to section 302 (b), P.P.C., and also altered his sentence from death to imprisonment for life plus a fine of Rs.50,
000. However, co-accused of the petitioner were given the benefit of doubt and acquitted.
3. Leave is sought on the grounds that the petitioner had no direct motive against the deceased and if, at all, anybody was aggrieved against the complainant party, it was Khan Amir Khan accused (since acquitted who had been assaulted by Muhammad Aslam complainant and was being tried under section 324, P.P.C. It is further stated that there is a serious contradiction between the ocular testimony and the medical evidence with regard to the distance from which the shots were fired at the deceased. It is next contended that the testimony of the eye-witnesses having been disbelieved qua majority of the accused, could not have been acted upon against the petitioner alone in the absence of any independent/material corroboration.
4. Leave is granted to consider the abovenoted contentions, N.H.Q./N-29/S Leave granted