1993 PLP 1322 (SCMR)
ISHAQ MASIH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1993 PLP 1322 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ISHAQ MASIH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 1322 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 1322 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 1322 (SCMR) (ISHAQ MASIH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A.I. Qarni Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- AA. Akhund, A.‑G. Sindh and Faizanul Haq, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordnance (VI of 1979), Art. 20‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑‑ Accused contended that nothing was available on record to indicate that he was one of the persons who committed robbery, nor there was any material to indicate that he had the knowledge that the golden bangles allegedly recovered from him were robbed and at the most his case fell under section 411, P.P.C. which was punishable with 3 years' R.I.‑‑‑Prosecution did not oppose the grant of bail to accused‑‑‑Supreme Court admitted the accused on bail by converting petition into appeal and allowing the same.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner has been denied the bail by the two Courts below. He is facing trial under section 20 of the Offence Against Property (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 alongwith two co‑accused. In support of the bail application it has been submitted by Sardar Muhammad Ishaque learned counsel for the petitioner that there is noting on record to indicate that the petitioner was one of the accused who committed rebbery, nor there is any matrial to indicate that the petitioner, had the knowledge that the nine golden bangles allegedly recovered from the petitioner were robbed. According to him at the most the petitioner's case falls under section 411, P.P.C. which is punishable by 3 years' R.I. Mr. AA. Akhund learned A.‑G. Sindh at this stage does not oppose the bail. The petitioner is admitted on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition is converted into an appeal and allowed. M.BA./I‑166/S Appeal allowed.