1970 PLP 794 (SCMR)
ASLAM alias KHAN AND 4 OTHERS — Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondents
| Citation | 1970 PLP 794 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ASLAM alias KHAN AND 4 OTHERS — Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1970 PLP 794 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1970 PLP 794 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1970 PLP 794 (SCMR) (ASLAM alias KHAN AND 4 OTHERS — Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Ahmad Saeed Kirmani, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing : 20th April 1970.
- Syed Ahmad Saeed Kirmani, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 10th March 1970, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1351 of 1970).
S. 498-Bail-Accused committed to Sessions Court for trial-Proper course for being released on bail to move Sessions Court and thereafter High Court and finally Supreme Court if necessary-Supreme Court declined to Interfere when no such steps taken. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
WAHIDUDDIN AHMAD, J.‑It is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioners that commitment proceedings have been finished and the petitioners have been committed to Sessions Court for trial. The proper course, therefore, for the petitioners is to move the Sessions Judge concerned for deciding the question whether on the evidence produced by the prosecution, the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail. It is after the matter is decided by the Sessions Court that the petitioners should move the High Court and if necessary to this Court, for the redress of their grievances. At this stage there is no ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed. Leave refused.