1984 PLP (C (PLC)
HAQ NAWAZ Versus COMMISSIONER, MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN
| Citation | 1984 PLP (C (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | HAQ NAWAZ Versus COMMISSIONER, MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN |
| Primary Law | Punjab Local Councils (Efficiency and Discipline) Roles, 1981‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP (C (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Local Councils (Efficiency and Discipline) Roles, 1981‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP (C (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP (C (PLC) (HAQ NAWAZ Versus COMMISSIONER, MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Athar Rehman Khan for Petitioner.
- Syed Afaq Shah for Respondent.
- Date of hearing : 21st March, 1983.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ R. 13‑Removal from service on account of sentence from Military Court‑Service of show‑cause notice‑To avoid show‑cause notice finding has to be given that same was not practicable‑Find ing to that effect not on record giving of notice necessary No show‑cause notice under S. 13 issued, action taken against petitioner, vitiated.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑ R. 13‑Removal from service on account of sentence from Military Court‑Service of show‑cause notice‑To avoid show‑cause notice finding has to be given that same was not practicable‑Find ing to that effect not on record giving of notice necessary No show‑cause notice under S. 13 issued, action taken against petitioner, vitiated. Athar Rehman Khan for Petitioner. Syed Afaq Shah for Respondent. Date of hearing : 21st March, 1983. The petitioner who was working as Tax Inspector, Kabirwala under Zila Council, Multan was sentenced to six months' R. I. by a Summary Military Court. He was, thereafter, removed from service by the Chair man, Zila Council, Multan vide his order, dated 11th March, 1982. The petitioner challenged the order in appeal before the Commissioner, but the appeal was dismissed on 22nd August, 1982. The Commissioner observed that a notice under rule 13 of the Punjab Local Council (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1981 was necessary but he decided to take no notice of the omission as according to him this was a mere for mality. The petitioner has challenged the orders of his removal in the present writ petition.
2. Rule 13 clearly provides for a show‑cause notice before an order can be passed under that rule. It is true that the notice can be avoided but then a finding has to be given that it is not practicable to give an opportunity to the accused and since there is no such finding on the record it was necessary to give a notice to the petitioner. This omission vitiates the action against the petitioner.
3. In view of the above considerations, the orders of the Chairman Zila Council, dated 11th March, 1982 are declared to be of no legal effect. He is however, at liberty to pass orders in accordance with the rules. The writ petition is disposed of with these observations. No order as to costs. M. Y. M. Petition allowed.