1986 PLP 1559 (MLD)
ALAM SHER‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1559 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Lehrasap Khan and Qurban Sadiq Ikram, JJ |
| Parties | ALAM SHER‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1559 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1559 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Lehrasap Khan and Qurban Sadiq Ikram, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1559 (MLD) (ALAM SHER‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa for Appellant.
- Dates of hearing: 26th, 27th May and 11th June, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑5. 13‑‑Evidence, appreciation of‑‑Recovery of unlicensed gun supported by an independent witness, having no enmity with accused besides a Police Inspector‑‑Conviction maintained in circumstances. Zafar Yasin for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑5. 13‑‑Evidence, appreciation of‑‑Recovery of unlicensed gun supported by an independent witness, having no enmity with accused besides a Police Inspector‑‑Conviction maintained in circumstances. Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa for Appellant. Zafar Yasin for the State. Dates of hearing: 26th, 27th May and 11th June, 1986. QURBAN SADIQ IRKAM, J.‑‑This is an appeal by Alam Sher against his conviction under section 13 of Arms Ordinance by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Multan who vide judgment, dated 21‑11‑1983 sentenced him to one year R.I.
2. The prosecution case in brief is that Alam Sher appellant was arrested in the connected murder case. _He on 2‑6‑1982 while in police custody led to the recovery of unlicensed .12 bore gun P.1 from his residential Kotha which was taken in possession vide memo. Exh. P. A. by Inspector Muhammad Shafi P.W.2 in presence of Nusrat P.W.1 and Allah Bakhsh F.W. (not examined). The prosecution examined P.W.1 Nusrat and P.W.2‑ Inspector Muhammad Shafi in support of its case. The accused denied the recovery and pleaded innocence. He did not produce any evidence in defence.
3. We have gone through the record of this case and have also heard the learned ‑ counsel for the appellant. Nusrat P.W. is an independent witness. He is not related to the deceased of the connected murder case. He has no enmity with Alam Sher appellant. Inspector Muhammad Shafi P.W.2 is also an independent witness. There is nothing to disbelieve the two witnesses. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. The conviction and sentence of Alam Sher is maintained. This sentence will run concurrently with the sentences awarded to Alam Sher appellant in connected murder case. S. G. D. Appeal dismissed.