1989 PLP 4725 (MLD)
AKHTAR HASSAN SHAH and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4725 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam, CJ |
| Parties | AKHTAR HASSAN SHAH and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4725 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4725 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam, CJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4725 (MLD) (AKHTAR HASSAN SHAH and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Major Waheed‑ud‑Din Virk and Syed Zahoor Ali Shah Gillani for Petitioners.
- Hamid Khan for Respondent
- Date of hearing: 3rd July, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.526‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss.302 & 307/34‑‑Transfer of cases Trial was lingering on since 1983 before Addl. Sessions Judge, Okara‑‑Counter cases were also pending‑‑Reference was made by Sessions Judge stating that case could not be disposed of in his district due to non‑cooperation of parties‑‑Case were transferred to Sessions Judge, Lahore for disposal.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.526‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss.302 & 307/34‑‑Transfer of cases Trial was lingering on since 1983 before Addl. Sessions Judge, Okara‑‑Counter cases were also pending‑‑Reference was made by Sessions Judge stating that case could not be disposed of in his district due to non‑cooperation of parties‑‑Case were transferred to Sessions Judge, Lahore for disposal. Major Waheed‑ud‑Din Virk and Syed Zahoor Ali Shah Gillani for Petitioners. Hamid Khan for Respondent Date of hearing: 3rd July, 1989. This is a reference from the learned District and Sessions Judge, Okara saying that a case under Section 302/307/34, P.P.C. was registered at Police Station Depalpur vide F.I.R. No.29 on 31‑1‑1972. The trial started before the learned Addl: Sessions Judge No.1 on 12‑11‑1983 and since then the case is lingering on for one reason or the other. He has also mentioned connected cases No.393/71, P.S. Depalpur, No.187/81 P.S. Chuchak and the connected case Sessions Trial No.8/88. He has stated that he felt that the, case cannot be disposed of in his District due to non‑cooperation of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the complainant in F.I.R. No.187/81 P.S. Chuchak as well as the learned counsel for the accused who are counsel for the accused in other cases or for the complainant in counter‑cases, state that the cases may be transferred to the learned Sessions Judge. Lahore for trial
3. In the circumstances, this reference is accepted and the cases mentioned therein are transferred to the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Lahore who shall start their hearing at the latest from 1st October, 1989 and hear the cases day to day and dispose of these as expeditiously as possible. The reference is disposed of accordingly. S.A./A‑756/L Reference accepted/Case transferred.