YLR 2004

2004 PLP 1825 (YLR)

Mufti ABDUL QUDDUS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 of 2003 in Criminal Appeal No.415 of 2003, decided on 22nd January, 2004.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2004 PLP 1825 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J
Parties Mufti ABDUL QUDDUS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 1825 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 1825 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 1825 (YLR) (Mufti ABDUL QUDDUS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Muhammad Asif Chohan for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑Ss. 426 & 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.316‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Suspension of sentence pending appeal‑‑‑Opinion of Medical Board showed that accused was suffering from cardiac disease‑‑‑Accused could not be denied concession of bail because once a person was found to be sick and infirm then his case would be covered by second Proviso to S. 497, Cr. P. C. and it would not be open to the Court to quantify his sickness and infirmity‑‑ Accused was admitted to bail during pendency of appeal suspending his sentence. Haji Mir Aftab v. The State 1979 SCMR 320 ref. Haroon Tayyab for the Complainant. Abdul Ghani for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Muhammad Asif Chohan for Petitioner. Haroon Tayyab for the Complainant. Abdul Ghani for the State. Mufti Abdul Quddus/petitioner, who, vide judgment dated 9‑12‑2003 handed down by a learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bahawalpur, was convicted alongwith other accused for offence under sections 316, P.P.C. and was sentenced to 14 years' R.I. in case F.I.R. No.452 registered at Police Station City Ahmadpur East on 30‑112003, has sought suspension of sentence and his release on bail during the pendency of the appeal on the ground of sickness alone.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon the opinion of Medical Board has argued that the petitioner qualifies as a sick person and, thus he should be admitted to bail. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed this application, mainly on the ground that the petitioner was not a sick person as he had been attending the Court throughout the trial. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, while conceding that the petitioner was a sick person, submitted that instead of releasing the petitioner on bail, main appeal should be fixed for hearing.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record of the case.

4. A perusal of the opinion of the Medical Board (Annexure 'C') reveals that the petitioner was suffering from cardiac disease. The relevant portion thereof is reproduced for ready reference hereunder:‑‑ "Mr. Abdul Quddus son of Wahid Bukhsh appeared before the Medical Board which comprised of Prof. Dr. M. Akbar Khan, Prof: of Medicine, Dr. Muhammad Bilal Ehsan Qureshi, Cardiologist and Dr. Shafiq Ahmad Bhait, Cardiologist under the chairmanship of Medical Superintendent BVH, Bahawalpur. He was examined and was advised certain medical tests pertaining to his cardiac problem. His B.P. during rest was 180/105 (R. arm), 180/105 (L. arm) during sitting and 190/ 100 during standing with pulse 60/m reg: He had systonic mermur at precardium. His resting E.C.G. was abnormal i.e. St.T changes were present. His ECHO cardiagram showed normal study but slight thicking of left ventricular muscles, aorta and mitral valve thicking. Biochemistry advised was within normal range. His exercise tolerance test was positive for cardiac disease. After, these tests and examination, we reached on conclusion that Mr. Abdul Quddus son of Wahid Bukhsh is suffering from Hypertensive grade II and Ischemic heart disease F. C.II." As the petitioner is a sick person, I am not persuaded to deny the concession of bail to him. I am fortified in my view by placing reliance on Haji Mir Aftab v. The State 1979 SCMR 320, wherein it was held by the apex Court that once a person is found to be sick and infirm then his case would be covered by the second proviso to section 497, Cr.P.C. and it would not be open to a Court to quantify his sickness and infirmity and the convict‑petitioner/appellant in that case was admitted to bail during the pendency of appeal. Thus, I suspend the sentence of the petitioner and admit him to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in tire sum of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar of this Bench. H.B.T./A‑80/L Sentence suspended.