Register
PCRLJ 1983

1983 P Cr (PLP)

AKHTAR ALI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1982-March-31
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1983 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties AKHTAR ALI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (AKHTAR ALI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Nazir Ahmad Shami for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497/498 and Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (P. O. 4 of 1979), Art. 11--Bail-Petitioner a previous convict of same offence alleged to have taken liquor-Punishment prescribed for offence three years-Bail granted.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 670-B of 1982, decided on 31st March, 1982.

S. 497/498 and Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (P. O. 4 of 1979), Art. 11--Bail-Petitioner a previous convict of same offence alleged to have taken liquor-Punishment prescribed for offence three years-Bail granted. Nazir Ahmad Shami for Petitioner. Abdul Fateh for the State. A case is registered against the petitioner under section 11 of the Hadud Ordinance, 1979. The allegation against him is that he had taken liquor. He is a previous convict also in respect of the same offence. But the punishment prescribed for the said offence is three years and, therefore, I do not see any reason why he should not be admitted to bail. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 5,000 (Rupees five thousand only) with and surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Faisalabad. This petition stands disposed of. Bail allowed

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PCRLJ
  • Volume Year: 1983
  • Citation Ref: 1983 P Cr (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1993 P Cr JAVED ASLAM AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Non‑petitioner
  • 1983 PCr EID WALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
  • 1983 P Cr L J 1395 FAZAL MUHAMMAD KHAN‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
  • 1983 P Cr GULAB SHAH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
  • 1983 P Cr STATE‑Appellant Versus BOSTAN KHAN AND OTHERS — ‑Respondents
  • 1983 P Cr STATE AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus IRFAN ASHRAF AND 4 OTHERS‑Non‑Petitioners