1986 PLP (1) (MLD)
S.M. GHARIB NAWAZ DACCAWALA‑‑Petitioner Versus SIND BAR COUNCIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP (1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Haider Ali Pirzada, JJ, |
| Parties | S.M. GHARIB NAWAZ DACCAWALA‑‑Petitioner Versus SIND BAR COUNCIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Haider Ali Pirzada, JJ,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP (1) (MLD) (S.M. GHARIB NAWAZ DACCAWALA‑‑Petitioner Versus SIND BAR COUNCIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rashid Rizvi for Respondent No.1 (in C.P.No.D‑37 of 1986).
- Raja Haq Nawaz for Respondent No.2 (in C.P.No.D‑37 of 1986).
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Benevolent Fund Scheme of Sind Bar Council‑‑Constitutional petition, admission of‑‑Petitioner who challenged through constitutional petition the authority of Sind Bar Council to collect benevolent fund, undertook to deposit amount of such benevolent fund with High Court‑‑On assurance of Sind Bar Council that no action would be taken against petitioner till hearing of petition, constitutional petition filed by petitioner was admitted by High Court for regular hearing. Saeed A. Sheikh, A.‑G. (in Miscellaneous No.102 of 1986). Petitioner in person (in C.P.No.D‑37 of 1986).
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD ZAHOORUL HAQ, J.‑‑Mr. Gharib Nawaz has submitted that he has no intention of avoiding the payment of Benevolent Fund, but he wants to challenge the Authority of Sind Bar Council to collect the same. He undertakes to deposit the amount of Rs.2,746 with the Nazir of this Court today. In view of this, we would admit this petition to regular hearing. Notice of this petition is waived by all the learned counsel appearing for the other sides.
2. Miscellaneous 102/86 is no more relevant now in view of the fact that Mr. Gharib Nawaz is depositing the relevant amount in Court and Mr. Rashid has stated that they. are not going to take any action till the hearing of this petition. This application is, therefore, disposed of. H.B.T Petition admitted.