PCRLJ 1969

1969L3009 (PLP)

N/A

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1969L3009 (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties N/A
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1969L3009 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1969L3009 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1969L3009 (PLP) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Kh. A. Waheed for Petitioner.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

S. 497 (2)‑BailPolice finding accused innocent and placing hire in column No. 2 of Challan‑Accused released on bail. Abdul Malik v. State P L D 1968 S C 349 fol. Kh. A. Waheed for Petitioner. Mufti Nazar Muhammad for the State. The police found Ibrahim petitioner innocent and placed him in column No. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, urges that the case falls under section 497(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such he should be released on bail. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, contends that four of the eye‑witnesses before the committing Magistrate inculpate the petitioner and since the offence alleged to have been committed is non‑bailable he should not be released on bail. The learned counsel for the State places reliance on case Abdul Malik v. State (P L D 1968 S C 349) in which also the accused was found innocent by the police and his bail was refused by the High Court, but the Supreme Court allowed bail, observing: "Similarly where reasonable grounds are not disclosed but grounds do exist for a further investigation and inquiry into the guilt of an accused person, the case will fall under section 497 (2) of the Cr. P. C., in which case again bail should not be withheld." In view of the above I accept this petition and release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 8,000.00 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the S. D. M., Narowal. A copy of this order be given dasti to the petitioner on payment of fee. Petition accepted.