2002 PLP 47 (MLD)
AMIN‑UD‑DIN‑‑‑Appellant p Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (IMPORT) DRY PORT
| Citation | 2002 PLP 47 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore. |
| Bench Members | Nasim Sikandar and Mansoor Ahmad, JJ |
| Parties | AMIN‑UD‑DIN‑‑‑Appellant p Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (IMPORT) DRY PORT |
| Primary Law | Customs Act (IV of 1969)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 47 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Customs Act (IV of 1969)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 47 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore. bench comprising: Nasim Sikandar and Mansoor Ahmad, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 47 (MLD) (AMIN‑UD‑DIN‑‑‑Appellant p Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (IMPORT) DRY PORT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Abdul Ghaffar for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 193‑‑‑Appeal against order refusing to grant interim relief by way of suspension of proceedings‑‑‑Auction having already been taken place, only a partial relief could be granted in appeal if it would ultimately succeed‑‑‑Delivery of the consignment had not been made to auction‑purchaser‑‑‑No prejudice would be caused to the Revenue if respondents were required not to deliver the goods for another further next sixty days and in the meanwhile the Tribunal would dispose of the appeal. A. Karim Malik for the Revenue.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 193‑‑‑Appeal against order refusing to grant interim relief by way of suspension of proceedings‑‑‑Auction having already been taken place, only a partial relief could be granted in appeal if it would ultimately succeed‑‑‑Delivery of the consignment had not been made to auction‑purchaser‑‑‑No prejudice would be caused to the Revenue if respondents were required not to deliver the goods for another further next sixty days and in the meanwhile the Tribunal would dispose of the appeal. Mian Abdul Ghaffar for Appellant. A. Karim Malik for the Revenue. This is an appeal against interlocutory order recorded by the learned ‑Customs, Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, on 30‑7‑2001 whereby they refused to grant interim relief by way of suspension of proceedings.
2. We are informed that the auction having already been taken place only a partial relief can be granted in the appeal if it succeeds ultimately. Also we are informed that the delivery of the consignment has not been made to auction‑purchaser.
3. In this view of the matter, we are of the view that no prejudice will be caused to the Revenue if they are required not to deliver the goods for another further next sixty days from today. In the meanwhile, the Tribunal will dispose of appeal before them.
4. This appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./A‑329/L Order accordingly.