1990 PLP 1476 (SCMR)
FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN QURESHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY DIR1rCTOR, FOOD, LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1476 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN QURESHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY DIR1rCTOR, FOOD, LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1476 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1476 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1476 (SCMR) (FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN QURESHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY DIR1rCTOR, FOOD, LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Iqbal Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 15th May, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment and order of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 14‑1‑1985 in Case No.964 of 1984). ‑‑‑S.4‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑Appeal filed . before Tribunal was dismissed by it as same was barred by time and no satisfactory explanation was given by appellant/petitioner for invoking jurisdiction of Tribunal out of time‑‑Discretion exercised' by Tribunal, held, called for no 'interference.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J: ‑‑The appeal of the petitioner against his compulsory retirement under Martial Law Regulation No.114 was dismissed by the Punjab Service Tribunal by judgment :dated 14‑1‑1985 on the ground of limitation. The order of his retirement was passed in March, 1972 by the Deputy Director, Food, Lahore Region, Lahore, confirmed by the Director, Food, Punjab. His appeal before the Tribunal was barred by time. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in limine on the ground of limitation because no satisfactory explanation was given by the petitioner for invoking the appellate jurisdiction of the Tribunal out of time. The discretion exercised by the Tribunal calls for no interference. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. H.B.T./F‑142/S Petition dismissed.