SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 216 (SCMR)

NAZIR AHMAD and 139 others‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Government of the Punjab and others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 539 of 1984 and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 352‑R of 1985, decided on 21st October, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 216 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ
Parties NAZIR AHMAD and 139 others‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Government of the Punjab and others‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 216 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 216 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 216 (SCMR) (NAZIR AHMAD and 139 others‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Government of the Punjab and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

Representation

  • Ch. Hamid‑ud‑Din, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Salah‑ud‑Din Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 21st October, 1985.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 18‑3‑1983 passed in Intra‑Court Appeal No. 81 of 1982). ‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4‑‑Civil service‑‑Government passing a final order and implementing same which was challenged by petitioner in appeal before Service Tribunal‑‑Petitioner praying for permission to withdraw petition with a view to press appeal before Service Tribunal‑‑Prayer granted and petition for leave to anneal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Judgment & Decree

S. A. NUSRAT, J.‑ This petitioners have filed a civil miscellaneous application stating that in the light of the interlocutory orders, dated 24‑10‑1984 and 22‑05‑1985 passed by this Court, in the above and other connected petitions, the Government of Punjab has since then actually passed a final order on 1‑8‑1985 and also stands implemented the same which has been challenged by the petitioners in appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Public Service Tribunal Act, 1974. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with a view to press the appeal before the Tribunal without prejudice to the contentions raised in the above petition and liberty to raise such legal pleas and contentions before the Service Tribunal as may be available and necessary. The request is justified and is granted. The civil main petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The civil miscellaneous petition also disposed of. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.