MLD 2005

2005 PLP 1245 (MLD)

MUHAMMAD AHMAD — Petitioner Versus S. H .O. and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2005-April-19
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2005 PLP 1245 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD AHMAD — Petitioner Versus S. H .O. and others — Respondents
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1245 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1245 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1245 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD AHMAD — Petitioner Versus S. H .O. and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Representation

  • Ayaz Ahmad Chaudhry for Petitioner.
  • Mian Khalid Shaukat Haideri for Respondent No.3.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 489-F

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.199 & 12

Constitutional petition

Quashing of F.I.R.

Offence under S.489-F, P.P.C. was constituted when the cheque was dishonestly issued by the accused

On the date of issuance of cheque by the accused offence under section 489-F, P.P.C. was not on the statute book

Accused could not be punished retrospectively in view of Article 12 of the Constitution

Impugned F.I.R. registered against the accused was quashed accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

Through this writ petition the petitioner has sought quashment of F.I.R. No.107 of 2005, dated 5-3-2005 registered on the complaint of one Amir Khan son of Saeed Ahmad under section 489-F, P.P.C. at Police Station Galla Mandi District, Sahiwal.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the complainant has himself stated in the F.I.R. that petitioner handed over a cheque to him on 28-5-2001 which was dishonoured on 6-6-2001 whereas offence under section 489-F, P.P.C. was inserted in P.P.C. vide Ordinance No.LXXXV of 2002 dated 25-10-2002, therefore, the same could not be made punishable retrospectively under the provision of Article 12 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Further contends that there is unexplained delay of four years in lodging the F.I.R. which itself speaks the mala fide of the part of the complainant. Further submits that the petitioner filed a civil suit in which interim relief was granted and ultimately compromise between the parties was effected and petitioner did not pursue that suit and the same was dismissed for non-prosecution. That case has been registered with mala fide intention due to previous civil litigation and revenge.

3. On the other hand learned counsel A.A.-G. assisted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 complainant submits that instant writ petition has no legal force and F.I.R. has been registered and is being investigated strictly in accordance with law, therefore, the same is not liable to be quashed.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was inserted in the P.P.C. through Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002 on 25-10-2002. The cheque in question bearing No.P.A. 4483671 was issued by the petitioner on 28-5-2001 which was dishonoured on presentation on 6-6-2001 and accordingly the instant F.I.R. was registered. Bare perusal, of section 489-F, P.P.C. indicates that offence has been made punishable on issuance of a cheque dishonestly towards repayment of a loan or fulfilment of an obligation which is dishonoured on presentation. So, it becomes clear that an offence under this provision of law is constituted when a cheque is dishonestly issued. On the date of issuance of cheque i.e. 28-5-2001 by the petitioner the offence under section 489-F, P.P.C. was not on the statute book. The petitioner cannot be punished in view of Article 12 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Article 12 ibid provides that no law shall authorize punishment of a person for an act not punishable by law at the time of commission. Restriction has been imposed on the legislative by this Article that it cannot punish by retrospective legislation for an act which was not offence at the time, it was committed. Continuation of prosecution will be mere abuse of process of law. Reliance can safely be placed on "Afaf Rahim v. Nisar Ahmad and others" (2004 PCr.LJ 263).

5. In view of above discussion, this petition is allowed and F.I.R. No.107 of 2005 dated 5-3-2005 registered under section 489-F, P.P.C. at Police Station Ghalla Mandi is hereby quashed. N.H.Q./M-1025/L F.I.R. quashed.