P L D 1959 (W (PLP)
M. MUHAMMAD SHAFT‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1959 (W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | M. Z. Khan, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan |
| Parties | M. MUHAMMAD SHAFT‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1959 (W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1959 (W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: M. Z. Khan, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1959 (W (PLP) (M. MUHAMMAD SHAFT‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Civil Service Mules, Punjab Volume 11, rule 5.33‑Patwari Compulsory retirement on completion of qualifying service of 25 years by order of competent authority‑Order final‑No appeal or revision competent‑Employee can make a representation to normal appellate authority.
Judgment & Decree
This is a petition in revision against order dated the 8th January 1959, of the Commissioner, Lahore Division who dismissed the appeal of M. Muhammad Shall, an ex‑Patwari of Tehsil Shahdara, District Sheikhupura, and upheld the order of the Collector, Sheikhupura District, dated the 23rd April 1958, by which the petitioner was retired from service compulsorily, under rule 5.33 of the C. S. R., Punjab, Volume II, for inefficiency, bad record of service and doubtful integrity.
2. The orders of the competent authority under rule 5.331 ibid, retiring the petitioner compulsorily from service on complet ing the qualifying service of 25 years and before reaching the, age of superannuation, are final, and not appealable. The executive' instructions, however, provide a representation to the normal appellate authority. There is no provision for revision of the appellate authority's directive. The petition of M. Muhammad Shafi, an ex‑Patwari, is therefore, not competent in law and is rejected. K. M. A. Petition rejected