1984 PLP 1051 (SCMR)
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAND ANOTHER — Petitioners Versus RAMZAN MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY-Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1051 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ----Art. 212(3)-Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4-Civil service-Promotion-Questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion-Distinguishable from questions of prospects of promotion-No question of law of public importance involved in case-Leave to appeal refused.-Civil service. |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | FEDERATION OF PAKISTAND ANOTHER — Petitioners Versus RAMZAN MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1051 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1051 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ----Art. 212(3)-Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4-Civil service-Promotion-Questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion-Distinguishable from questions of prospects of promotion-No question of law of public importance involved in case-Leave to appeal refused.-Civil service. bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1051 (SCMR) (FEDERATION OF PAKISTAND ANOTHER — Petitioners Versus RAMZAN MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney-General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing : 13th November, 1983.
- Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney‑General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 11-5-1983 in Appeal No. 137(R) of 1981). Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Art. 212(3)-Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4-Civil service-Promotion-Questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion-Distinguishable from questions of prospects of promotion-No question of law of public importance involved in case-Leave to appeal refused.-[Civil service]. Dr. Ehsan-ul-Haq v. The Province of Punjab arid others 1980 S C M R 972 ref. Respondent in person.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑--Art. 212(3)‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4‑Civil service‑Promotion‑Questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion‑Distinguishable from questions of prospects of promotion‑No question of law of public importance involved in case‑Leave to appeal refused.‑[Civil service]. Dr. Ehsan‑ul‑Haq v. The Province of Punjab arid others 1980 S C M R 972 ref. Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney‑General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Respondent in person. Date of hearing : 13th November, 1983. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 11‑5‑1983 of the Central Service Tribunal; whereby the respondent's service appeal was allowed. Learned Deputy Attorney‑General has, relying on Dr. Ehsan‑ul‑Haq v. The Province of Punjab and others (1980 S C M R 972), contended that the Tribunal could not interfere with the orders of promotion passed by the concerned authority, as no appeal in this behalf was competent. It is not denied that questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion are distinguishable from those of prospects of promotion. As contended by the learned Deputy Attorney‑General the law in this behalf has already been declared by this Court that being so no question or any other question of law of public importance is involved in this case. It is thus not a fit case for grant of leave to appeal under Article 212 of the Constitution. S.Q. Leave refused.