1989 P Cr (PLP)
GHULAM QASIM and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Fazal Karim, J |
| Parties | GHULAM QASIM and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Fazal Karim, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (GHULAM QASIM and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Faiz Muhammad Khosa for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 426(1‑A)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Suspension of sentence pending appeal‑‑Bail‑‑Accused convicte4 for murder and for causing injuries and remained in jail since their conviction‑‑Deed executed by injured complainant placed on record which showed that parties had resolved their differences and had agreed to live as good neighbours‑‑Accused who in no way were to be blamed for delay in the disposal of appeals, were entitled to benefits of 5.426(1‑A), Cr.P.C. Kanwar Muhammad Younus for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 of 1987 in Criminal Appeal No. 193 of 1985, decided on 8th November, 1987. ‑‑‑S. 426(1‑A)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Suspension of sentence pending appeal‑‑Bail‑‑Accused convicte4 for murder and for causing injuries and remained in jail since their conviction‑‑Deed executed by injured complainant placed on record which showed that parties had resolved their differences and had agreed to live as good neighbours‑‑Accused who in no way were to be blamed for delay in the disposal of appeals, were entitled to benefits of 5.426(1‑A), Cr.P.C. Sardar Faiz Muhammad Khosa for Petitioners. Kanwar Muhammad Younus for the State. The petitioners stand convicted for the murder of Aziz Muhammad and for causing injuries to Bakht Ali complainant. The latter is the father of Aziz Muhammad, deceased. The petitioners have been in jail since their conviction viz. 3‑10‑1985. A deed executed by Bakht Ali P.W. has been placed on the record. This shows that the parties have resolved their differences and have agreed to live as good neighbours. Bakht Ali is present in person. As the petitioners have been in jail since their conviction and they are not in any way to be blamed for the A delay in the disposal of the appeal, there appears no reason why they should not be given the benefit of section 426(1‑A), Cr.P.C. I, therefore, allow them to be released on bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge/Acting Sessions Judge, Rajanpur.
2. A copy of the bail bonds shall be sent to this Court for record. M.Y.H./G‑255/L Sentence suspended.