1999 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

AJMAL MIAN, C.J.‑‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal against the judgment dated 21‑5‑1997 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal in Appeal No. 116(K) of 1996 filed by the petitioner praying for the following relief: "In view of the above submissions it is respectfully prayed that the Honourable Tribunal may kindly be pleased to declare and hold that the appellant is entitled to be promoted in Grade‑17 and/or be placed in Grade‑17 with effect from the date of his confirmation and/or with effect from 6/9th July, 1988 when his other colleagues were promoted as such and direct the respondents to promote him accordingly and grant him all consequential benefits." dismissing the same on the ground that since the petitioner had not passed the departmental examination he was not entitled to promotion to BPS‑

17. The petitioner has, therefore, filed the present petition. In support of the above petition Ch. Ghulam Hasan Gulshan; learned counsel for the petitioner, has vehemently, contended that the Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Power Wing) Stores Management Service Rules, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) which have been relied upon by the respondents were not made applicable to the Generation section of WAPDA. To reinforce the above submission, he has invited our attention to the WAPDA Office Memorandum dated 9‑4‑1984 and the Notification dated 2‑9‑1984 whereby the Rules were made applicable to the areas of Electricity Boards of Lahore, Multan, Peshawar, Hyderabad and Quetta. His further submission was that first time the Rules were made applicable to the Generation section of WAPDA by Notification dated 16‑10‑1996 (the above documents are placed in Part‑II of the paperbook) and therefore, the petitioner was entitled to promotion to BPS‑17 with effect from 9‑7‑1988 when his colleagues were so promoted. On the other hand, Sh. Zamir Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/caveator has invited our attention to the Office Order dated 6‑7‑1988 (at page 25 of the paper book Part‑1), whereby the General Manager (Adorn.), WAPDA, re‑designated the Assistant Store Officers in BPS‑15 as Field Store Managers BPS‑17 with effect from 16‑6‑1983, without passing the departmental examination for the reason that the Rules were not in the field. His further submission was that the petitioner joined service in 1986, and therefore, he‑could not have pressed for the benefit of the above office order. The above position seems to be correct. As regards the applicability of the Rules to the petitioner, it will suffice to observe that the above plea was not specifically raised before the Tribunal in the memo of the petition nor the same has been raised before this Court in the memo of petition. The question as to whether there was any order or notification prior to the above notification dated 16‑10‑1996 p making the Rules applicable inter alia to Generation section, is a question of fact which we are not inclined to examine at this stage. Admittedly, the petitioner has already been promoted in BPS‑17 after clearing the examination. In our view it is not a fit case for grant of leave and the same is refused. The petition is dismissed. H.B.T./A‑123/S Petition dismissed.