2010 PLP 1290 (MLD)
Mst. NAJMA and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BADIAN and 9 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 1290 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. NAJMA and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BADIAN and 9 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1290 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1290 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1290 (MLD) (Mst. NAJMA and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BADIAN and 9 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Bhagwan Das Bheel for Petitioners.
- Roshan Ali Chandio for Respondents Nos.3 and 6. (in person) Ghulam Mustafa alias Nawab Respondent No.3.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 365-B, 496-A, 382, 458, 506(2), 337-H(ii), 504, 147, 148 & 149
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Abduction, theft and house breaking
Constitutional petition
Alleged abductee was deaf and dumb, her statement was recorded by the Investigating Officer with the assistance of Principal, Special Education Institute and Assistant Referencer from Special Education Institute concerned
Such statement reflected that petitioner/alleged abductee on having understood the questions put by Investigating Officer regarding her alleged abduction, categorically stated that she had not been abducted by any one, that she, out of her own free-will had entered into a valid contract of marriage with the male petitioner
Alleged abductee further stated that she was happy with her husband, and wanted to go and live with him
Police Officer and Investigating Officer had conceded that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the proceedings emanating from F.I.R. and that same could be quashed
Since the very allegation of abduction had been falsified in view of statement of the alleged abductee, remaining allegations also stood falsified
Proceedings were quashed and petitioner would be at liberty to go and live with her husband
Authorities were directed not to cause any harassment whatsoever to the petitioners.
Judgment & Decree
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI, J.
Through instant petition, petitioners have sought protection against the harassment allegedly caused by the private respondents with the help of official respondents on account of matrimonial dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioner No.1 being sui juris has entered into a valid contract of marriage out of her own free-will with petitioner No.2, which has annoyed her father Ghulam Mustafa. On 10-5-2010 learned A.A.-G. has filed statements on behalf of the official respondents along with the F.I.R. No.10 of 2010 registered at Police Station Kadhan, under sections 365-B, 496-A, 382, 458, 506(2), 337-H(ii), 147, 148, 149 and 504 the P.P.C., lodged by the father of the petitioner No.1 namely Ghulam Mustafa, alleging abduction of petitioner No.1 and other crimes against petitioner No.2. On inquiry from the respondent No.1 about her alleged abduction it transpired that she is deaf and dumb: Keeping in view this fact this Court directed to issue notice to Principal Special Education GOR Colony, Hyderabad to assist this Court for recording the states, it of the petitioner No.1. Today Riazul Rehman Kerio Principal and Ahsan Ahmed Talpur Assistant Referencer from Special Education GOR Colony, Hyderabad have effected their appearance and statement of petitioner No.1 has been recorded by the I.O. with their assistance, which is taken on record. Such statement reflects that petitioner No.1 on having understood the questions posted by the I.O. through the assistance of Mr. Ashan Ahmed Talpur Assistant Referencer regarding her alleged abduction categorically stated that she has not been abducted by anyone and she out of her own free-will has entered into a valid contract of marriage with petitioner No.2. She further stated that she is happy with her husband, petitioner No.2 and wants to go and live with him. In view of the statement of the petitioner the learned DPG and the I.O. present in Court, concede that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the proceedings emanating from F.I.R. No.10 of 2001, Police Station Kadhan pending, hence the same may be quashed. I am also of the view that since the very allegation of the abduction has been falsified in view of the statement of the alleged abductee, i.e. the petitioner No.1, remaining allegations also stand falsified. In view of hereinabove facts, the proceedings emanating from F.I.R. No.10 of 2010 Police Station Kadhan are hereby quashed and the petitioner No.1 would be at liberty to go and live with her husband. The respondents are directed not to cause any harassment whatsoever to the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./N-28/K Proceeding quashed.