2009 PLP 565 (YLR)
KAMRAN MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 565 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Islamabad |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Aslam, C.J. and Raja Saeed Akram Khan, J |
| Parties | KAMRAN MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 565 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 565 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Islamabad bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Aslam, C.J. and Raja Saeed Akram Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 565 (YLR) (KAMRAN MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(b)
Bail, grant of--Meagre quantity of narcotic i.e. 610 grams Charas was allegedly recovered from accused
Accused was behind the bars since 16-2-2008 and was no more required for the purpose of further investigation
Even challan had not yet been submitted in the court
Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Tanveer Chaudhry for the Petitioner. Kh. Asif Mahmood, Federal Counsel for the State. Zaman, S.-I. with record.
Judgment & Decree
Through this criminal miscell aneous, petitioner seeks his post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.70 dated 15-2-2008, registered at Police Station Kohsar Islamabad under section 9(b) C.N.S.A, 1997.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is first offender, whereas, there is no likelihood that trial will be concluded in the future. He further adds that meager quantity of narcotic i.e. 610 grams of Charas was allegedly recovered from the petitioner.
3. On the other hand, learned Federal Counsel argues that the petitioner does not deserve any leniency, as he has committed heinous offence and was caught red handed.
4. Arguments heard. Record perused.
5. Meagre quantity of narcotic i.e. 610 grams Charas was allegedly recovered from the petitioner. He is behind the bars since 16-2-2008. He is no more required for the purpose of further investigation. Even challan has yet not been submitted in the Court.
6. In these circumstances, we are inclined to admit the petitioner to bail, subject to furnishing bail bond valuing Rs.1,00,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. H.B.T./K-1/Isl Bail granted.