SCMR 1969

1969 PLP (2) (SCMR)

ARSHAD BEGUM‑Petitioner Versus IJAZ A. MAHMOOD‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 293 of 1968, decided on 8th October 1968.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1969 PLP (2) (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties ARSHAD BEGUM‑Petitioner Versus IJAZ A. MAHMOOD‑Respondent
Primary Law Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1969 PLP (2) (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1969 PLP (2) (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1969 PLP (2) (SCMR) (ARSHAD BEGUM‑Petitioner Versus IJAZ A. MAHMOOD‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890)

Representation

  • Sh. Ghias Muhammad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Ahmad Khan Kazi; Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Masood Akhtar, Attorney for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing : 8th October 1968.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 27th June 1968, in C. R. No. 446 of 1967): --S.12‑Directions given by High Court that mother should make available minor at certain intervals to ‑meet father‑Such directions whether vouch safed by provisions of S. 12‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Judgment & Decree

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 27th June 1968, in C. R. No. 446 of 1967): --S.12‑Directions given by High Court that mother should make available minor at certain intervals to ‑meet father‑Such directions whether vouch safed by provisions of S. 12‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question. Sh. Ghias Muhammad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Ahmad Khan Kazi; Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Masood Akhtar, Attorney for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing : 8th October 1968. MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether the directions given by the High Court that the petitioner shall make her minor daughter available to meet the respondent, her father, at certain intervals in the chamber of his counsel are vouched' by the provisions of section 12 of the Guardians and Wards, Act which deals with temporary custody and protection of the person or property of a minor. Security Rs. 1,

000. The impugned directions given by the High‑Court shall remain in abeyance meanwhile. Leave granted.