2006 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AKRAM DAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AKRAM DAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AKRAM DAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Pervaiz Inayat Malik for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Emigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Ss.17 & 22
Accused had already been opined by investigating agency to be innocent and a recommendation had already been made for seeking his discharge
Said fresh development in case would surely benefit the accused in the matter of bail
Judgment & Decree
ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.
Through this petition Muhammad Akram Dar petitioner has sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.70 registered at Police Station F.I.A., Passport Circle, Gujranwala on 18-8-2004 in respect of offences under sections 17/22 of the Emigration Ordinance, 1979.
2. Earlier the petitioner had approached this Court through Criminal Miscellaneous No.7276/B of 2004 seeking post-arrest bail in the same criminal case but that petition was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 9-12-2004. The present petition has now been filed before this Court on a fresh ground. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the Investigating Agency has already concluded its investigation vis-a-vis the petitioner has now come to a definite conclusion that the allegation leveled against the petitioner in the F.I.R. are false and baseless and resultantly a recommendation has already been made seeking discharge of the petitioner. This development as a fact has been accepted by the learned Standing Counsel for the Federation of Pakistan appearing on behalf of the Federal Investigation Agency as correct and, thus, he has not opposed the present petition.
3. As the petitioner has already been opined by the Investigating Agency to be innocent and a recommendation has already been made for seeking his discharge, therefore, this fresh development in this case surely enures to the benefit of the petitioner in the matter of bail. This petition is, thus, allowed and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M-367/L Bail granted.