1989 PLP 248 (MLD)
Mst. RAZIA BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHID IQBAL‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 248 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | M. Mahboob Ahmad, J |
| Parties | Mst. RAZIA BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHID IQBAL‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 248 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 248 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: M. Mahboob Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 248 (MLD) (Mst. RAZIA BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHID IQBAL‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Abdul Hameed Butt for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 14th January, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.25‑A‑‑Transfer of suit‑‑Suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by husband against wife in Court at place `T' was sought to be transferred to place `F where wife's suits for dissolution of marriage and maintenance against husband were pending adjudication‑‑Suit of wife for maintenance was filed earlier in time in Court where she subsequently filed suit for dissolution of marriage‑‑Held wife was Pardanashin lady and had to bring up two minor children, it was more inconvenient to her to travel rather than it was to husband ‑‑Wife apprehended bodily harm at hands of husband if she was made to go to place `T' for defending herself‑‑Controversy arising in three suits filed by parties at different places was likely to give rise to same questions of law and fact and to avoid conflict of judgments, such family matters should be decided by one and same Court‑‑Suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by husband at place `T' was ordered to be transferred to place `F where suits for maintenance and dissolution of marriage filed by wife were pending adjudication.
Judgment & Decree
This petition under Section 25‑A of the Family Courts Act seeks transfer of the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled "Shahid lqbal v. Mst. Razia Bibi from the Court of Mr. Muhammad Liaqat Ali, Judge Family Court, Toba Tek Singh to the Court of Mr. Ghulam Rasool Ranjha, Judge Family Court, Faisalabad before whom the proceedings for setting aside ex parte decree in a maintenance suit filed by the petitioner against the respondent are pending. It is also asserted that the petitioner compelled by the circumstances has also instituted a suit for dissolution of marriage against the respondent which again is pending adjudication before Mr. Ghulam Rasool Ranjha, Judge Family Court, Faisalabad.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the suit of the petitioner for maintenance having been riled earlier in time the suit of the respondent is liable to be transferred to the same Court especially when another suit viz. the suit for dissolution of marriage of the parties has also been entrusted to the same Court and the controversy arising in the three suits is likely to give rise to same questions of fact and law.
3. In the same context the learned counsel contends that it is well settled that controversies arising between the same parties in family matters should be decided by one and the same Court to avoid conflict of judgment.
4. The next contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the f. petitioner is a Pardahnashin lady who has to bring up two minor children and, therefore, it will be more inconvenient to her to travel rather than it will be to the respondent. ‑‑
5. The last contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the `D petitioner apprehends bodily harm at the hands of the respondent if she is made to go to Toba Tek Singh for defending herself there.
6. No one has appeared for the respondent who has been proceeded against ex parte. The contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner arc, therefore, going unrebutted. Otherwise also these appear to have force in view of the precedent case‑law on the subject of transfer of suits.
7. In view of the foregoing discussion this petition is allowed and the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled "Shahid lqbal v. Mst. Raria Bibi is withdrawn from the Court of Mr. Muhammad Liaqat Ali, Judge Family Court, Toba Tek Singh and entrusted to the Court of Mr. Ghulam Rasool Ranjha, Judge Family Court, Faisalabad. There will, however, be no order as to costs.
8. The parties shall appear before the transferee Court in the suit for restitution of conjugal rights on 15‑2‑1989. The Court at Toba Tek Singh from which the suit has been withdrawn shall ensure that the record of the case reaches the transferee Court well in advance of the date fixed above. The transferee Court shall ensure that in future same dates of hearing are given in the three suits between the parties so that no extra inconvenience is caused. ??????????? H.B.T./R‑119/L ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Suit transferred.