1988 PLP 727 (MLD)
Syed NAZIM‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1988 PLP 727 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mazhar Ali, J |
| Parties | Syed NAZIM‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 727 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 727 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Mazhar Ali, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 727 (MLD) (Syed NAZIM‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ ‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860, Ss.188 & 307/34‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑ Injury attributed to accused not falling under definition of grievous hurt given in S.320, P.P.C: --Interim bail already granted to accused, confirmed in circumstances. Salahuddin Khan Gandapur for Applicant. AA. Muhammadally, A. A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
The applicant, who is involved in a case under section 307/34/188, P.P.C., vide Crime No. 408 of 1987 lodged at Police Station Gulbahar, District Central, has been allowed interim bail vide order dated 24‑12‑1987 on furnishing security in the sum of Rs.15,000 with P.R. bond in the like amount. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. AA. .Mohammadali learned AA.‑G. candidly conceded that notwithstanding the fact that the Medical Officer had described to injury caused to the injured Masood Mahmood, as grievous it cannot legally be called a grievous injury inasmuch as none of the eight clauses of section 320, P.P.C., which define `grievous injury' is applicable to the instant case. The learned AA.‑G., therefore, states that he no objection if the interim Bail granted to the applicant is confirmed on similar terms. Having heard the arguments of the counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the medical report, which is available with the learned AA.‑G. I am inclined to agree with him that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 1, therefore, confirm the interim bail on similar terms and conditions on which it was granted on 24‑12‑1987. SA./N‑106/K Bail confirmed.