1989SCMR281 (PLP)
S. IJAZ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Forests Department and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989SCMR281 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | S. IJAZ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Forests Department and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR281 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR281 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR281 (PLP) (S. IJAZ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Forests Department and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record and Hamid Mukhtar, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 20th July, 1988.
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record and Hamid Mukhtar, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 18-1-1982 in Appeal No. 439/1134 of 1979).
S. 4--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)--Appreciation of evidence- Dismissal of petitioner's appeal by Service Tribunal, challenged--Plea that petitioner, though not at fault, was made scapegoat and his superiors who committed serious irregularities were let off on account of their official position, not entertained--Tribunal having decided petitioner's case after taking relevant facts into consideration and giving cogent reasons for dismissal of appeal and there being no error of law or question of public importance to be examined b) Supreme Court, leave to appeal was refused.
Judgment & Decree
Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record and Hamid Mukhtar, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents. Date of hearing: 20th July, 1988. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑S. Ijaz Hussain son of Ashiq Hussain seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 18‑1‑1982 whereby the appeal filed by him was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to establish that it was not the petitioner who was at fault. As a matter of fact his superiors committed serious illegalities but they on account of their official position were let off and the petitioner was made the scapegoat. This is the solitary contention raised before us. But this is not good l ground for leave to appeal. So far as the case of the petitioner is concerned, that A the Tribunal decided after taking the relevant facts into consideration and giving cogent reasons for dismissing his appeal. In the absence of any error of law or question of public importance to be examined by this Court, the leave is refused. Dismissed. M.I./S‑197/S Petition dismissed.