1987 PLP 1550 (SCMR)
Mst. RABIA BIB I‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM QADIR and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1550 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. RABIA BIB I‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM QADIR and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1550 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1550 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1550 (SCMR) (Mst. RABIA BIB I‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM QADIR and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Aftab Iqbal Chaudharee, Advocate Supreme Court and Hakim Muhammad Sardar Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 16th June, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, dated 4‑2‑1980 in R.S.A. No. 823 of 1964). ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100‑‑Second appeal‑‑High Court after re‑examining evidence affirmed findings of appellate Court‑‑Findings of High Court not suffering from any infirmity, leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑The petitioner brought a suit to avoid a sale on the ground that it was fictitious and also tainted with fraud. The trial Court decreed her suit but on appeal it was dismissed by the Additional District Judge. The petitioner preferred a second appeal in the High Court. A learned Single Judge re‑examined the evidence, affirmed the findings of the Additional District Judge and dismissed the appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to persuade us that the findings of the High Court or the Additional District Judge suffer from any infirmity. The petition is accordingly dismissed. M.I. /R‑19/S. Petition dismissed.