YLR 2008

2008 PLP 2160 (YLR)

FAQIR MUHAMMAD and 3 others — Petitioners Versus GOVT. OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 4 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. D-1187 of 2005, decided on 2nd February, 2007.
Honorable Judges
Mushir Alam and Muhammad Afzal Soomro, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 PLP 2160 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Mushir Alam and Muhammad Afzal Soomro, JJ
Parties FAQIR MUHAMMAD and 3 others — Petitioners Versus GOVT. OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 4 others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 2160 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 2160 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Mushir Alam and Muhammad Afzal Soomro, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 2160 (YLR) (FAQIR MUHAMMAD and 3 others — Petitioners Versus GOVT. OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 4 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • ----Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Petitioner who claimed to be lessee of the property in question had placed on record copy of the judgment of the High Court wherein it had already laid down formula and criteria for different categories of persons including lease holder, encroacher and or allottee under any authority---Petitioner had prayed that he could be paid compensation and be dealt with under due process of law---Counsel for respondents made a statement at the Bar that petitioner would also be dealt with accordingly---Petition was disposed of in pari materia of judgment recorded by the High Court.
  • Nemo for Petitioner.
  • Manzoor Ahmed for Respondent (CDGK).

Judgment & Decree

Petitioner claims to be lessee in respect of the property coming in the way of Lyari Expressway. The petitioner has already placed on record copy of the judgment passed in large number of C.Ps leading Constitutional Petition bearing No.147/02, wherein the learned Division Bench has already laid down formula and criteria for different category of the person including leaseholder, encroachers and or allottee under any authority, Petitioner has prayed that he may be paid compensation and be dealt with for due process of law.

2. Mr. Manzoor Ahmed learned counsel for CDGK states that City District Government is dealing with the cases of each individual on the basis of title which they possess and in accordance with criteria laid down by a learned Division Bench in, the judgment recorded in C.P. No. 147 of 2002, he makes a statement at Bar that the petitioner will also be dealt with in accordance therewith. Petition is accordingly disposed of in pari materia of the judgment recorded in C.P. No.147 of 2002, dated 14-10-2003. H.B.T./F-34/K Order accordingly.